Passenger Rights Overview

This page summarizes key EU passenger-rights rules in plain language. It is for orientation and does not replace legal advice.

Start case

When do EU passenger rights apply?

The main factors are departure point, destination, and whether the flight is operated by a European airline. Not every route with an EU connection automatically falls under the EU regulation.

How to assess applicability in practice

The logic below covers the typical constellations. It shows when the EU regulation usually applies and when the Montreal Convention becomes more relevant.

EU / EWR / Schweiz
Departure point is the strongest trigger
Key question
Departure or arrival with an EU connection?

The first question is whether the flight starts in the EU / EEA / Switzerland or only arrives there. For inbound flights, the airline becomes the second filter.

Flight constellation
Departure in EU / EEA / Switzerland

If the flight starts in this area, the EU regulation usually applies regardless of whether the operating carrier is European or non-European.

Operating carrier
Any airline
EU law applies
Flight constellation
Arrival in EU / EEA / Switzerland

For flights into the EU, the operating carrier matters. If it is a European airline, the EU regulation will usually apply as well.

Operating carrier
EU carrier
EU law applies
Flight constellation
Arrival in EU / EEA / Switzerland

If the flight lands in the EU but is operated by a non-European airline, claims under the EU regulation often do not apply.

Operating carrier
Non-EU carrier
Often no EU law
Rule of thumb: the safest trigger is a departure from the EU, EEA, or Switzerland. For inbound flights, the operating airline often becomes decisive.

What applies outside the EU scope?

If the EU regulation does not apply, the Montreal Convention may still become relevant on international flights. It is not about fixed compensation amounts like 250, 400, or 600 euros, but mainly about provable losses and additional expenses.

Key takeaway

The Montreal Convention does not replace EU rules. It complements them and often becomes important outside the core EU scope or for additional heads of damage.

Case 1

It is especially important in baggage loss, baggage damage, or delayed baggage situations.

Case 2

In delay scenarios, provable extra costs may also matter, for example hotel costs, necessary replacement purchases, or onward travel expenses.

Case 3

Unlike the EU regulation, you usually need to prove the actual loss. Receipts, invoices, and structured documentation are therefore critical.

How much compensation is possible?

For the EU flat-rate compensation, the key question is whether you reached your destination with at least a 3-hour delay. The amount then mainly depends on flight distance.

Flat compensation should be distinguished from assistance obligations and refund rights. These can exist in parallel.

Flat amount
Flat compensation

From 3 hours delay at destination, compensation of 250, 400, or 600 euros may apply.

+
Waiting time
Assistance duties

During the waiting time, meals, drinks, communication options, and if needed hotel accommodation may become relevant.

From 5 hours
Withdrawal / refund

With more than 5 hours delay, withdrawal from travel and ticket reimbursement may come into consideration.

Flat amount by distance
from 3 hours arrival delay
RequirementUp to 1,500 km1,500 to 3,500 kmOver 3,500 km
Arrival delay of 3+ hours250 EUR400 EUR600 EUR
Delay example
Worked example

A flight from Frankfurt to Athens arrives at 18:00 instead of 14:00. With a 4-hour arrival delay and a distance above 1,500 km, a flat amount of 400 euros may regularly be in scope. In addition, assistance duties during the waiting time may apply.

Extraordinary circumstances

The term is narrower than airlines often suggest. Not every technical problem or operational delay is extraordinary. The key distinction is whether the cause belongs to the airline's own sphere or comes from outside.

Usually not extraordinary

Claim often possible

In these groups, compensation often remains possible because the cause is usually treated as part of the airline's normal operational risk:

+
Technical and operational issues
  • ordinary technical defects without external impact
  • wear and tear, maintenance issues, or aircraft allocation problems
  • flight-plan reorganization or delayed aircraft provision
+
Staffing and internal operations
  • faulty crew planning or exceeded duty-time limits
  • internal strikes of the operating airline
  • check-in or boarding delays caused by airline staff
+
Events within the airline's control
  • damage during baggage loading, catering, or towing operations
  • fuel shortages or other avoidable planning failures
  • lack of de-icing material if based on inadequate preparation

Usually extraordinary

Claim often excluded

Here compensation is often excluded because the cause comes from outside and is not part of the airline's normal operating sphere:

!
Weather and natural events
  • serious storms, snowstorms, thunderstorms, hail, strong winds, or dense fog
  • airspace restrictions or safety limitations caused by weather
  • lightning strike, bird strike, or other external impacts on the aircraft
!
Authorities, airport, air traffic control
  • orders by air traffic control or official restrictions
  • strikes by air traffic controllers or airport staff
  • closure of an airport, runway, or key airport systems
!
External disruption and safety events
  • political unrest, entry restrictions, or travel warnings
  • sabotage, security incidents, or major disruption by passengers
  • medical emergencies on board or exceptional passenger incidents

Typical weather situations without compensation

Weather cases
volcanic eruption / ash clouddense fogheavy snowfallthunderstorm frontlightning strikestrong gustsheavy rainhail

Important: the airline must prove more than just bad weather

Important check

Even if an extraordinary circumstance exists, the airline is not automatically discharged. It must also show that it considered all reasonable measures to get you to your destination as early as possible. That can include rebooking onto other airlines or even alternative means of transport.

Use cases (expandable)

Open the case type that matches your situation and check the points that usually matter most.

Flight delay
Expand
The decisive factor is not the departure delay, but the actual delay on arrival at destination.
The key reference point is the arrival delay at destination. If your flight leaves 4 hours late but lands with less than 3 hours delay, there is usually no EU flat compensation.
Under 2 hours
1
Usually no claim yet

Delays below 2 hours usually have to be accepted. A compensation claim or formal assistance rights normally do not arise yet. After about 1 hour, however, it can still make sense to ask the airline for goodwill support.

From 2 hours
2
Assistance duties

From 120 minutes, the airline generally has to look after you, for example with snacks, drinks, and communication options. Depending on the situation, this may be provided directly or via vouchers.

From 3 hours
3
Flat compensation

From 3 hours arrival delay, flat compensation of 250 to 600 euros may apply. You do not need to prove a concrete financial loss. The loss of time itself may already be enough.

From 5 hours
4
Refund, rebooking, or alternative transport

From more than 5 hours delay, you can usually choose between ticket reimbursement, free rebooking to a later time, or onward travel by the next suitable means of transport such as train, bus, or taxi.

What you typically get in delay cases
Arrival delay
Under 2 hours
Flight distance
any distance
Typical right
usually no EU flat amount
Arrival delay
From 2 hours
Flight distance
any distance
Typical right
assistance duties
Arrival delay
From 3 hours
Flight distance
up to 1,500 km
Typical right
250 EUR
Arrival delay
From 3 hours
Flight distance
1,500 to 3,500 km
Typical right
400 EUR
Arrival delay
From 3 hours
Flight distance
over 3,500 km
Typical right
600 EUR
Cancellation
Expand
In cancellation cases, the first question is usually whether you want replacement transport or a refund.
EU passenger-rights rules typically apply to flights within the EU, departures from the EU, and arrivals in the EU with an EU carrier. In cancellation cases, the central decision is often whether to continue the trip or withdraw from it.
Step 1
1
Choose replacement transport or refund

After a cancellation, you can generally choose between re-routing to your destination or full ticket reimbursement. Which option is better depends on whether you still want to complete the journey.

Step 2
2
Replacement flight does not have to be the very next one

You can generally also request a later replacement flight at a time that suits you, provided seats are available. The airline should not simply charge extra for that.

Step 3
3
Compensation often depends on advance notice

If the cancellation was communicated less than 14 days before departure, flat compensation between 250 and 600 euros may also be in scope. Reasonable replacement transport can still affect the result.

Step 4
4
If the airline does not act: self-help

If the airline does not react in time to a demanded rebooking, you can usually set a reasonable deadline. If it expires, you may often arrange replacement yourself and claim extra cost as self-help expenditure.

Key cancellation scenarios
Situation
You still want to travel
What you can demand
replacement transport
What matters
other flights or means of transport may also count
Situation
You no longer want to travel
What you can demand
full ticket refund
What matters
typically within 7 days
Situation
Notice less than 14 days before departure
What you can demand
250 to 600 EUR
What matters
depends on distance and reasonable replacement transport
Situation
Outbound and return flight in one booking
What you can demand
in some cases refund of both flights
What matters
single booking is important
Situation
Airline does not react in time
What you can demand
your own replacement booking
What matters
set a deadline first and document everything
Denied boarding / overbooking
Expand
If boarding is denied against your will although you did everything correctly, claims are often comparatively clear.
Overbooking usually means more tickets were sold than seats are available. Legally, the key issue is involuntary denied boarding. The typical conditions are timely check-in, valid booking documents, and no security or health reason that justified refusal.
Step 1
1
Do not give up your seat voluntarily

If you voluntarily surrender your seat in exchange for a voucher, cash, or an upgrade, statutory EU compensation will usually no longer apply. For the full claim, it matters that transport was denied against your will.

Step 2
2
Choose replacement transport or refund

You can generally either demand prompt replacement transport or withdraw from the flight and request reimbursement of the ticket price. Compensation may still exist in parallel.

Step 3
3
250 to 600 EUR may be available

Compensation does not depend on the ticket price, but on flight distance. Depending on the route, 250, 400, or 600 euros may be due. If a very prompt and reasonable replacement is offered, the amount may still be reduced.

Step 4
4
Secure assistance and evidence

During the waiting time, drinks, meals, communication options, and if needed hotel and transfer may become relevant. Ask for written confirmation of the reason and keep records of expenses, vouchers, and communication.

Key overbooking scenarios
Situation
Boarding denied against your will
Typical right
250 to 600 EUR
What matters
timely check-in and valid documents
Situation
You give up your seat voluntarily
Typical right
usually no EU flat amount
What matters
voucher or upgrade often replaces the statutory claim
Situation
You still want to travel
Typical right
replacement transport
What matters
other flights or means of transport may also count
Situation
You no longer want to travel
Typical right
ticket refund
What matters
compensation may still exist in parallel
Situation
Replacement flight arrives only slightly later
Typical right
compensation may be reduced by half
What matters
legal delay thresholds depend on distance
Missed connection
Expand
The key issue is usually not the delay of one segment, but whether you reach your final destination 3+ hours late because the connection was missed.
A claim usually depends on the feeder flight and the onward flight being part of one single booking. The decisive factor is then the delay at final destination. With separately booked tickets, the legal position is much weaker because connection planning is often your own responsibility.
Step 1
1
One booking is the most important starting point

The feeder flight and the onward flight should have been reserved in a single booking flow. In that case, the journey is more likely to be treated as one connected trip. With separate tickets, this link often does not exist.

Step 2
2
Final-destination delay usually matters most

For multi-segment trips, the key metric is usually the arrival delay at final destination. If you arrive there 3 or more hours late, compensation between 250 and 600 euros may come into scope.

Step 3
3
The airline must offer a way to continue

If you miss the onward flight because the feeder flight was delayed, the airline usually has to offer replacement transport to your final destination. This can be another flight, but also another suitable onward-transport option.

Step 4
4
Waiting time and overnight stay create additional rights

After sufficient waiting time, meals and communication options may become due. If the onward flight is moved to the next day, the airline will usually have to provide hotel accommodation and transfer.

Step 5
5
Minimum connection time (MCT) often shifts the burden of proof

If the official minimum connection time was undercut, that strongly suggests the connection was no longer realistically reachable. In that setting, the case is usually much more favorable for the passenger. If the connection time was formally above MCT, the claim does not automatically disappear. It simply becomes more evidence-heavy: the passenger may need to explain in more detail why the connection was still impossible to catch, for example because of long transfer routes, shuttle buses, passport control, security control, or delayed deboarding. Conversely, where MCT was undercut, it is usually very difficult for the airline to show that missing the connection was still the passenger's fault.

Key missed-connection scenarios
Scenario
Single booking, 3+ hours at final destination
Typical right
250 to 600 EUR
What matters
the full route to final destination is decisive
Scenario
Long wait at transit airport
Typical right
assistance duties
What matters
meals and communication depend on waiting time
Scenario
Onward flight only next day
Typical right
hotel + transfer
What matters
usually relevant if overnight stay becomes necessary
Scenario
Trip abandoned after 5+ hours
Typical right
refund or alternative transport
What matters
especially relevant if continuation no longer makes sense
Scenario
Separate tickets
Typical right
often no claim for the full connection
What matters
planning risk then usually lies with the traveler
Scenario
Replacement arrives only slightly later
Typical right
compensation may be reduced
What matters
legal delay thresholds depend on distance
Minimum connection times (MCT) at major airports
MCT

MCT is not a rigid entitlement rule, but highly relevant in practice. It indicates when a connection is usually still planned as reachable. Below MCT, the facts usually favor the passenger. Above MCT, the case often becomes more evidence-heavy.

Frankfurt (FRA)
same terminal: 45 min · change: 60 min
v
Same terminal
45 min
Terminal change
60 min

Major Lufthansa/Star Alliance hub; long walking routes and passport checks can still matter.

London Heathrow (LHR)
same terminal: 60 min · change: 90 min
v
Same terminal
60 min
Terminal change
90 min

Terminal changes are especially sensitive; construction or security pressure can add time.

Paris Charles de Gaulle (CDG)
same terminal: 60 min · change: 75-90 min
v
Same terminal
60 min
Terminal change
75-90 min

Schengen/non-Schengen changes are often particularly time-critical.

Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS)
same terminal: 40 min · change: 50 min
v
Same terminal
40 min
Terminal change
50 min

Single-airport layout helps, but non-Schengen links still usually need more buffer.

Madrid Barajas (MAD)
same terminal: 45 min · change: up to 165 min
v
Same terminal
45 min
Terminal change
up to 165 min

Especially with different terminals or carriers, transfers can become very long.

Munich (MUC)
same terminal: 30-40 min · change: 45 min
v
Same terminal
30-40 min
Terminal change
45 min

Domestic/Schengen transfers are often efficient; international ones usually need more margin.

Vienna (VIE)
same terminal: 25 min · change: 40 min
v
Same terminal
25 min
Terminal change
40 min

Schengen links are often quick, non-Schengen noticeably slower.

Zurich (ZRH)
same terminal: 40 min · change: 45-50 min
v
Same terminal
40 min
Terminal change
45-50 min

Efficient layout, but controls still remain a timing factor on non-Schengen transfers.

Rebooking / schedule brought forward
Expand
The key issues are when you were informed about the rebooking and how strongly the new flight deviates from the original plan.
A rebooking usually means you were moved onto another flight, so that the flight number or timing changes noticeably. If only the time changes, the case may instead be treated as a schedule change, early rescheduling, or cancellation-like change. In practice, compensation often follows the cancellation rules.
More than 14 days before
1
Usually no compensation

If the airline informs you more than 14 days before planned departure, EU flat compensation is usually not available. You do not have to accept a voucher and may often instead demand a refund of the ticket price if you do not want to accept the change.

7 to 14 days before
2
Compensation only if the deviation is substantial

In this period, compensation usually does not apply if the replacement flight departs no more than 2 hours earlier and reaches the final destination no more than 4 hours later. If the new flight deviates more than that, 250 to 600 euros may come into scope.

Less than 7 days before
3
Stricter thresholds in favor of the passenger

If you are informed only 7 days or less before departure, the replacement flight should generally leave no more than 1 hour earlier and arrive at final destination no more than 2 hours later. If those thresholds are exceeded, compensation is often possible.

Additional costs
4
Do not simply absorb extra costs yourself

If the rebooking causes extra costs, for example for transfer, hotel, or a switch to a different airport, keep all receipts. If you are moved to another airport, the airline will usually have to cover the additional transport costs.

Key rebooking scenarios
Time of notice
more than 14 days before
Deviation of the new flight
not decisive
Typical result
usually no EU compensation
Time of notice
7 to 14 days before
Deviation of the new flight
max. 2 hrs earlier / max. 4 hrs later
Typical result
usually no EU compensation
Time of notice
7 to 14 days before
Deviation of the new flight
more than 2 hrs earlier or more than 4 hrs later
Typical result
250 to 600 EUR may apply
Time of notice
less than 7 days before
Deviation of the new flight
max. 1 hr earlier / max. 2 hrs later
Typical result
usually no EU compensation
Time of notice
less than 7 days before
Deviation of the new flight
more than 1 hr earlier or more than 2 hrs later
Typical result
250 to 600 EUR may apply
Baggage issues
Expand
Delayed, damaged, or lost baggage is usually not governed by EU flat compensation rules, but mainly by the Montreal Convention.
Baggage cases are usually about damages under the Montreal Convention. The upper limit is 1,288 Special Drawing Rights (SDR) per person; the euro value fluctuates with the exchange rate. Fast reporting, proper evidence, and the correct deadline are crucial.
At the airport
1
File a PIR and keep the baggage tag

If the suitcase does not arrive or arrives damaged, you should have a Property Irregularity Report (PIR) created at the airport immediately. The baggage tag from check-in and photos of the condition of the baggage are especially important.

Delayed baggage
2
Necessary replacement purchases may be recoverable

If baggage arrives late, reasonable expenses for replacement clothing and hygiene items may be recoverable. The key issue is what was truly necessary in the specific travel situation. At your home location, such claims usually do not exist. Keep all receipts.

Damaged baggage
3
Current value often matters more than new value

If a suitcase is damaged, the airline may generally be liable. Compensation is often based on current value; if repair is possible, the airline may also choose repair. Damage to fragile contents can be problematic if they were unsuitable for checked baggage or poorly packed.

After 21 days
4
Delayed becomes legally lost

If the baggage does not reappear within 21 days, it is usually treated as lost. The focus then shifts to the current value of the suitcase and contents, plus any further provable loss.

Deadlines
5
7 days, 21 days, 2 years

Damaged baggage should usually be reported in writing within 7 days. Claims for delayed baggage should usually be submitted in writing within 21 days after the baggage is returned. Damage claims are typically time-barred after 2 years.

Key baggage scenarios
Problem
Baggage delayed
Typical right
reimbursement of reasonable emergency purchases
What matters
PIR, receipts, and travel context are decisive
Problem
Baggage damaged
Typical right
repair or damages
What matters
current value and quick notice matter
Problem
Baggage still missing after 21 days
Typical right
treated as loss
What matters
suitcase and contents should be documented as well as possible
Problem
Damage notice
Typical right
written notice within 7 days
What matters
an airport PIR is strongly recommended
Problem
Delay notice
Typical right
written notice within 21 days after return
What matters
attach all purchase receipts
Problem
Package travel
Typical right
additional rights against the tour operator may exist
What matters
price reduction can become relevant in parallel
Downgrade / lower travel class
Expand
If you are seated in a lower class than booked, your claim is usually calculated as a percentage of the fare for the affected segment.
A downgrade is not about the usual 250 to 600 euro distance-based compensation. Instead, Article 10 of the EU passenger-rights regulation provides for a fare reimbursement. The key reference point is the price of the specific affected flight segment, usually excluding taxes and charges.
Up to 1,500 km
1
30 % reimbursement

For routes up to 1,500 km, the airline generally has to reimburse 30 % of the fare of the affected segment if you are moved to a lower class.

1,500 to 3,500 km
2
50 % reimbursement

For medium-distance routes, the statutory percentage is usually 50 % of the relevant segment fare.

Over 3,500 km
3
75 % reimbursement

For long-haul routes, reimbursement can reach 75 %. This is often economically significant where business or premium tickets are affected.

Important
4
Only the affected segment counts

If a ticket contains multiple segments, reimbursement is usually calculated only for the specific segment affected by the downgrade. The airline should generally pay within 7 days.

Key downgrade scenarios
Flight distance
up to 1,500 km
Reimbursement
30 %
What matters
based on the fare of the affected segment
Flight distance
1,500 to 3,500 km
Reimbursement
50 %
What matters
usually excluding taxes and charges
Flight distance
over 3,500 km
Reimbursement
75 %
What matters
especially relevant for business or premium tickets
Flight distance
multiple flights on one ticket
Reimbursement
only proportionate reimbursement
What matters
the affected segment is decisive
Flight distance
additional class-related charges
Reimbursement
may matter in addition
What matters
for example where taxes depend on class
Start case