Cost risk blocks action
Many people drop valid claims early.
Conflict resolution – simple, fair, and without cost risk
Conflicts arise quickly in daily life: delayed flights, unpaid invoices, or contract disputes.
Many valid claims are never pursued because the path feels complex, costly, and slow.
Ravion was built for exactly this: transparent enforcement without claimant cost risk.
Long duration
Traditional routes often take many months.
High complexity
Deadlines and procedure steps feel hard to manage.
Focus
Example: Flight rights
What typically happens today
Most claimants choose debt-collection providers, lawyers, or public conciliation.
Debt-collection providers
Often high success-fee deductions and long timelines.
Lawyer route
Can be effective, but often includes fee complexity and litigation risk.
Public conciliation
Free, but often long handling time and limited process transparency.
How much remains from 600 EUR plus 150 EUR hotel costs?
Illustrative payout comparison.
Compensation (600 EUR)Hotel costs (150 EUR)
Payout at 750 EUR claim
Ravion750 €
free
Ersatz-Pilot438 €
about 27% fee on 600 EUR
Flightright386 €
about 30% + VAT on 600 EUR
EUflight400 €
about 33.32% on 600 EUR
AirHelp390 €
about 35% on 600 EUR
Why court paths deter many users
Typical path:
1Filing and formal review
2Court-cost clarification
3Written submissions and deadlines
4Hearings and follow-up dates
5Evidence phase
6Judgment and cost settlement
To make differences tangible, we show the comparison with a flight-rights case.
Option comparison
| Criterion | Ravion | Debt-collection provider | Lawyer | Public conciliation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | free | high fee (often 30–50%) | lawyer fee + possible litigation risk | free |
| Share retained | high claimant share | often around half remains | procedure dependent | full amount possible, no guarantee |
| Cost risk | no risk | no risk | possible litigation risk | no risk |
| Speed | avg. around 16 days | often many months | often very long | typically around 3–18 months |
| Transparency | high | often limited | lawyer dependent | limited |
| Process steering | active and structured | standardized | individual but heavy | often reactive and slow |
| Commitment | can exit anytime | claim often assigned | fee agreement may lock costs | can exit |
Why Ravion is often the better choice
transparent process
fast process
no cost
no lock-in
Why Ravion is fair
Ravion is paid only when settlement is reached, incentivizing realistic and fair outcomes.
Why this works in practice
1. You keep control
You decide each step.
2. No dead end
You can still switch to lawyer or debt-collection provider.
3. Clear process
Status and next steps remain transparent.
4. Economic focus
Goal is higher net payout.
Start your claim now
Start your case with a structured digital flow. You stay in control and decide whether a proposal should be sent.
Start caseIllustrative figures only. Ravion is free for consumers in B2C. This does not constitute legal advice.